✔ (FOUND by kh4m4ri) Vivienne by Bakayo
-
@Clowns Yo relax, they probs just skimmed it.
For context Bakayo's tos is 24 different things. Regular, avatar and asset tos. Some of it makes sense but a lot of it is a bit weird. -
Bumpo
-
Up
-
@Clowns Ironically most of this TOS doesn't stand up in court. If the creator decides to come after you. In the US that is. Avi's are protected under fair use, and right to repair laws. The only time any avi creator can realistically sue you is if you're hosting a website with the intent to Re-Sell their "Art"/"Work" but sharing files to a friend\friends is completely legal in every US State, and is protected under federal law. I'm not aware of how it works outside the US but yeah just know that these TOS's are only suggestions from the seller. The funniest one to me is the 18+ one. They'd be admitting to selling pornographic content, which they'd have to have a business license for (which they don't), and they'd have to have some level of age gating on their website (which they don't). So..... technically we could sue any avi creator that was making this claim for negligence, and malpractice.
-
@Clowns Ironically most of this TOS doesn't stand up in court. If the creator decides to come after you. In the US that is. Avi's are protected under fair use, and right to repair laws. The only time any avi creator can realistically sue you is if you're hosting a website with the intent to Re-Sell their "Art"/"Work" but sharing files to a friend\friends is completely legal in every US State, and is protected under federal law. I'm not aware of how it works outside the US but yeah just know that these TOS's are only suggestions from the seller. The funniest one to me is the 18+ one. They'd be admitting to selling pornographic content, which they'd have to have a business license for (which they don't), and they'd have to have some level of age gating on their website (which they don't). So..... technically we could sue any avi creator that was making this claim for negligence, and malpractice.
@GayBonk Exactly that last part about the 18+ only buyers. If they were legally upholding this claim, then it would be like what most 18+ websites did and just make it not accessible to use in certain states where porn has been outlawed!!
-
@Clowns Ironically most of this TOS doesn't stand up in court. If the creator decides to come after you. In the US that is. Avi's are protected under fair use, and right to repair laws. The only time any avi creator can realistically sue you is if you're hosting a website with the intent to Re-Sell their "Art"/"Work" but sharing files to a friend\friends is completely legal in every US State, and is protected under federal law. I'm not aware of how it works outside the US but yeah just know that these TOS's are only suggestions from the seller. The funniest one to me is the 18+ one. They'd be admitting to selling pornographic content, which they'd have to have a business license for (which they don't), and they'd have to have some level of age gating on their website (which they don't). So..... technically we could sue any avi creator that was making this claim for negligence, and malpractice.
GayBonk said:
@Clowns Ironically most of this TOS doesn't stand up in court. If the creator decides to come after you. In the US that is. Avi's are protected under fair use, and right to repair laws. The only time any avi creator can realistically sue you is if you're hosting a website with the intent to Re-Sell their "Art"/"Work" but sharing files to a friend\friends is completely legal in every US State, and is protected under federal law. I'm not aware of how it works outside the US but yeah just know that these TOS's are only suggestions from the seller. The funniest one to me is the 18+ one. They'd be admitting to selling pornographic content, which they'd have to have a business license for (which they don't), and they'd have to have some level of age gating on their website (which they don't). So..... technically we could sue any avi creator that was making this claim for negligence, and malpractice.
@avicollector you could also sue the website/website provider for hosting pornographic content that was available to minors without proper protections put into place.
-
Just be aware that literally none of this is fully legal. Most of these avi creators are just random people making claims that they say you have to abide by. All of this only works if no one decides to sue each other, and we all just play nice, and understand that everyone is broke rn. Just pay what you want, when you want, to whoever you want. Times are rough, avi creators are not an essential part of the economy they should be grateful that they get a dime out of anyone right now. The bar is so low that it really doesn't take a highschool degree to figure out. The returns on this market are actually fucking insane compared to most Art related jobs. I think avi creators are going about this whole thing in the worst way possible.
-
bump anime head pleaseee!!
-
bump
-
Bump
-
Bump
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login