LF Faputa nsfw

[kingtiger88]

@Senko im hoping someone does post it , sucks a model ive been looking forward to is being paywalled

[Silence-056]

@Malganis-Lefay Honestly, fair enough, Sosu!

[Silence-056]

@Senko Honestly, should make it so that people do not post it for about a week or so after it was released officially, let the creator make some cash first. It worked for that Enforcer 1.2 rifle release, where the posters respected the wishes of the creator by having a two-week waiting notice so that people can actually BUY the model for a while (One person who did not was RAPIDLY downvoted).

I am just happy to have a Demo Version to play with in the mean time.

[kingtiger88]

This post is deleted!

[Timtee]

@Malganis-Lefay Personally I do look forward to the full version, just for me, like many others here, money simply just is not available to buy stuff majority of the time online, if at all. Tho I'm sure that as long as your willing to let people have the full version for free here after a period of time of like 1-2 weeks at least, then that'd be nice.

[Malganis Lefay]

actually makes me think of instead of focusing on the shader issue for the minor missing functionality, i could instead look into the "pants" and standard "clothing" which would be everything missing for the demo version. and than handle it a bit like my bondrewd, where "demo" got released far earlier than the payed version...

[kingtiger88]

This post is deleted!

[Lum_Invadar]

wth did I miss lol

[Timtee]

I dunno what is with the deleted posts from kingtiger honestly.

[BrownieBatter48]

i mean its fair that people assumed the model would be free due to the nature of this website as well as this being a post that was originally to nab a private and its a recreation. But as a fellow creator i 100% support getting that bag, if something could be worked out for as a like grace period, i dont think many would argue. we've already been waiting months, whats a few more weeks?

[kingtiger88]

@Timtee eh i realized there was no point in giving my two cents , i dont want my account flagged cause i think the model should be free

[Timtee]

@BrownieBatter48 Agreed honestly. Though considering recent events on the game majority of the avatars here on this site are for... It may be a bit difficult for an avatar like this one to exist without issue necessarily, but that's just my opinion and knowledge of what is going on afaik.

[Malganis Lefay]

@Timtee I dont keep up with events, and i am scared to ask what that recent stuff is...

[Senko]

I'm curious

[Timtee]

@Malganis-Lefay There was a recent announcement regarding VRC's moderation being "enhanced" and... part of that is the introduction of an AI powered autonomous photon bot that basically has been set up to ban literally anything nsfw or remotely such, or avatars used by like toxic user gangs or so on so forth. Mind you this is only from what I've overheard, Idk how many avatars have since been purged by it. But I do know it was introduced around Christmas time right around when VRC's servers went down because of an AWS outage.

[kingtiger88]

@Timtee yeah they said they gonna start cracking down hard on nsfw avis in pubs

[Silence-056]

@Timtee I get the feeling that this will backfire on VRC big time.

Half the reason people even USED VRC was to goof around with some naughty things. I mean, Maps like Sunset Bar will likely be marked for deletion because of this, due to the use of alcohol and the game mimicking the effects of getting absolutely PLASTERED.

Taking that away means that VRC will quickly turn into what Roblox currently is.

[kingtiger88]

@Silence-056 oh no they straight up said in a update keep nsfw in private instance they just gonna crackdown on people going into pubs with nsfw stuff on

[Malganis Lefay]

I thankully set everthing up so far that NSFW stuff automaticly deactivates when switch into the avatar or when you switch worlds and when its deactivated, the stuff completely disapears.
Userprotection for both sides in that regard is very important to me.

but yeah, involving AI in the process just screems shareholder pleasing with unimaginable longterm fuckery for everyone else involved

[Striker10]

@Timtee I've seen the same talks going around, and hardly anything is factually sourced.

That's not to say what the Dev team has said isn't any better for sourcing as facts. They announced no AI is used, what they are doing, please bear with me on recalling, someone is checking through images of uploaded, and if the avatar uploaded looks too lewd, such as bits are out due to Improper Disabling Before Upload, will result in the account temp banned.

I would elaborate and say, again hearing from others, avatars that do not have bits, were still flagged. Leaning me to think, as I haven't seen images of these avatars...if nips, vagina, or ass is textured or shaped, would also raise a red flag. Best example of this I can think of, Zoichi 3.0 has a painted, and blendshaped, asshole.

Not to forget people uploading clearly lewd avatars as Public instead of Private.

Personally, I like the idea of avatars flagged as Adult/Sexual, can only be seen in Age Gated instances. Mentioned once, someone suggested going as far as only Age Verified users can see the Adult/Sex tagged avatars (outside age gated instances).

I'd say, big boobs and ass avatars are still "ok".

Then there's the Group Instances. (At least) Before the situation came up, anyone in a group who had the permission to create a group instance, ALSO had the permission to name it what ever they wanted. There IS a permission to control users to create Custom Named instances. From what I've overheard in RBN's group, this permission for custom named instances just didn't work. RBN group was "gone", and the group owner got the temp-banned, because someone else created a bad named instance. Weeks later, they were able to bring the group back from the abys, as though nothing happened. They now use a bot to check for instances with custom names, and close them.